Synthesis Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Combination - Research Paper Example The Serpent of Paradise was composed by Edward Abbey. Also, in this work he centers around his experience like a recreation center officer in the south-eastern Utah’s Arches National Monument. The most significant topics of Edward Abbey are-exploitation’s of flawless condition by the travelers and People’s family relationship towards the creatures. The Themes Present in the Works: â€Å"The liberation considered as the drawing in, dramatic, brimming with quick paced puzzle and wonderful writing portraying the common habitat that will before long be pulverized by a force company’s dam† (Cusatis p.110). The principle topic of Deliverance is that of the endurance in the nature against its overwhelming chances. What's more, the fundamental subjects that are available in the Serpents of Paradise are-exploitation’s of perfect condition by the travelers and People’s connection towards the creatures. A portion of different topics as present in the Most Dangerous game seem to be; Arrogance: Rainsford, an egotistical creature tracker and he have no torment or dread. Furthermore, Zaroff, another self-important tracker and he feel that so as to engage himself, he should chase people. Savagery: It identifies with the conduct of characters towards one another and furthermore towards the encompassing creatures. Corruption of man: â€Å"The last and most predominant topic is the Degradation of Man† (Marin p.5). It manages the corruption of man from being a unimportant creature tracker to being a tracker of man and the progressions from being tracker to that of a killer. The Common Themes in these Works: While contrasting crafted by The Deliverance, The Serpents of Paradise and The Most Dangerous Game; we can locate a typical subject which is available in every one of these works i.e., the mentality of people towards the nature. Man’s battle and endurance in the wild. Every one of these works center around this spec ific subject and the creator depicts this topic with different episodes In Deliverance, James Dickey speaks to the topic so that before the excursion begins, the three among the four explorers doesn't have any involvement with the excursion through the backwoods. Lewis Medlock who is one among the four is a survivalist and prepared outdoorsmen who truly designs the excursion and aides the gathering. The focal point of the novel is that of the rape and the assault by two mountain dwellers in the waterway bank and which prompts a grouping of homicide. During the excursion they confronted a great deal of contentions from the nature and from men. What's more, they battled a great deal to conquer these challenges that is, during their kayak ride they stood up to with the Rough River and furthermore they went up against a contention with the two hillbillies. Despite the fact that one among the four passed on and they attempted to have a battle with the neighborhood men in the wood and the y had the option to escape from it. Every one of these episodes show that man battles for endurance and they all take in an encounter from this excursion. In the start of the story, Ed was deficient with regards to the information about the nature and in the wake of confronting all the challenges through the excursion, their demeanor toward the excursion have changed a ton and they consider nature as increasingly incredible and subsequently they opinioned that regard ought to be given to the nature. In the Serpents of Paradise by Edward Abbey, he is seeing the Arches national park as wild. This work gives the

Profile and Common Characteristics of a Pedophile

Profile and Common Characteristics of a Pedophile Pedophiliaâ is a mental issue where a grown-up or more established youthful is explicitly pulled in to little youngsters. Pedophiles can be anybody old or youthful, rich or poor, instructed or uneducated, non-expert or proficient, and of any race. Be that as it may, pedophiles regularly exhibit comparable qualities. These are only pointers and it ought not be accepted that people with these attributes are pedophiles. In any case, information on these attributes combined with sketchy conduct can be utilized as a ready that somebody might be a pedophile. Profile and Behavior Frequently male and more than 30 years of age.Single or with barely any companions in his age group.Some have psychological sickness, for example, a state of mind or character disorder.If wedded, the relationship is more partner based with no sexual relations in the early stages.Vague about delays in business which may demonstrate a misfortune in work for flawed reasons or conceivable past incarceration.Often converse with or treat kids like grown-ups. Interests and Hobbies Regularly entranced with kids and youngster exercises, seeming to lean toward those exercises to grown-up situated activities.Often allude to kids in unadulterated or saintly terms utilizing clear words like honest, wonderful, divine, unadulterated, and different words that portray kids yet appear to be wrong and exaggerated.Hobbies are untainted, for example, gathering famous costly toys, keeping reptiles or outlandish pets, or building plane and vehicle models. Explicit Age Targets Explicit period of kid they focus on; some incline toward more youthful youngsters, some older.Often his condition or an uncommon room will be enriched in kid like stylistic theme and will engage the age and sex of the kid he is attempting to entice.Often favor kids near pubescence who are explicitly unpracticed, yet inquisitive about sex. Connections Much of the time, the pedophileâ turns out to be somebody known to the youngster through school or another action, for example, a neighbor, educator, mentor, individual from the pastorate, music teacher, or sitter. Relatives like moms, fathers, grandmas, granddads, aunties, uncles, cousins, stepparents, etc may likewise be sexual stalkers. Business The pedophile will frequently be utilized in a place that includes day by day contact with youngsters. If not utilized, he will set himself in a place to accomplish charitable effort with kids, frequently in an administrative limit, for example, sports training, physical game guidance, solo coaching or a position where he has the chance to invest unaided energy with a youngster. The pedophile frequently searches out timid, crippled, and pulled back kids, or the individuals who originate from upset homes or oppressed homes. He at that point showers them with consideration, endowments, provoking them with excursions to attractive spots like event congregations, zoos, shows, the sea shore, and other such places. Pedophiles work to ace their manipulative abilities and frequently release them on disturbed kids by first turning into their companion, assembling the childs confidence. They may allude to the kid as uncommon or develop, speaking to their should be heard and comprehended, to then tempt them with grown-up exercises with sexual substance like x-evaluated motion pictures or pictures. Preparing like this frequently obliges utilization of liquor or medications to hamper the capacity to oppose or review occasions that happened. Minor youngsters can't assent, and sex without assent is assault. capture-bonding It isn't unordinary for the youngster to create affections for the predator and want their endorsement and proceeded with acknowledgment. They will bargain their inborn capacity to interpret great and terrible conduct, at last advocating the hoodlums awful conduct out of compassion and worry for the grown-ups government assistance. This is regularly contrasted with Stockholm Syndrome-when casualties become appended genuinely to their captors. Kinship With Parents Commonly pedophiles will build up a cozy relationship with a solitary parent so as to draw near to their youngsters. Once inside the home, they have numerous chances to control the youngsters utilizing blame, dread, and love to befuddle the kid. On the off chance that the childs parent works, it offers the pedophile the private time expected to manhandle the kid. Retaliating Pedophiles take a stab at following their objectives and will quietly work to create associations with them. It isn't phenomenal for them to be building up a not insignificant rundown of potential casualties at any one time. A considerable lot of them accept that what they are doing is right and that engaging in sexual relations with a kid is really solid for the youngster. Practically all pedophiles have an assortment of erotic entertainment, which they ensure no matter what. Huge numbers of them additionally gather trinkets from their casualties. They infrequently dispose of either their pornography or assortments in any capacity whatsoever. One factor that neutralizes the pedophile is that in the end the youngsters will grow up and review the occasions that happened. Frequently pedophiles are not brought to equity until such time happens and casualties are maddened by being exploited and need to shield other youngsters from similar outcomes. Laws, for example, Megans Law-a government law went in 1996 that approves nearby law authorization offices to tell the general population about sentenced sex guilty parties living, working or visiting their networks, have helped uncover the pedophile and permits guardians to more readily secure their kids.

Assessing strategies to combat neighbourhood disputes (Anti-social behaviour)

Surveying techniques to battle neighborhood debates (Anti-social conduct) in denied committee home zones: A contextual investigation on the Isle of Dogs, in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. Undertaking Issue: The Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, characterizes against social conduct as carrying on: â€Å"In a way that caused or was probably going to cause provocation, alert or trouble to at least one people not of a similar family as (the defendant).† (Home Office (a) 2003) As this definition covers a wide scope of violations from prostitution, to having unreasonably high hedges1, I have chosen to explicitly concentrate on neighbor debates, for example, commotion contamination, brutal events, and discourteous refuse dumping and comparative neighbor to neighbor questions. The focal issue of the thesis will be initially, the assessment of how well four inquired about systems used to battle against social conduct, all utilized in four contextual analyses, really battle and forestall hostile to social neighbor debates. Besides, how well those systems would be set to manage neighbor debates in the Isle of Dogs. Every methodology that has been inquired about has an important contextual analysis that shows exactly how that technique functions when sent by and by. Every procedure will be surveyed considering the pertinent contextual investigation. Contextual investigations have been utilized concerning hostile to social neighbor debates from the Isle of Dogs (East London), Blackburn, Manchester, and Scotland. The inquiries that this exposition will try to discover are: * What are the most unmistakable and explored systems that have been examined, assessed, and utilized by scholastics and specialists? * How valuable are every one of these techniques, and what are their quality's and what are their shortcomings? * To what degree, can every one of these procedures be effectively applied to neighbor debates inside the Isle of Dogs, with its own one of a kind circumstance for example assorted ethnic populace, and outrageous neediness on the doorstep to a well off territory (Canary Wharf)? * How high is the degree of hostile to social conduct inside the precinct, comparative with other London districts? * What is so unique or impossible to miss about the Isle of Dogs? I will find this focal issue inside the more extensive setting of the reasons for against social conduct, and think about the different elements of neighbor debates. For instance I will likewise think about the age and racial measurements (Lucey and Reay 1999), and the sex measurements (Nixon and Hunter, 1999), of hostile to social conduct and specifically, neighbor questions. Strategy Outline of the scholarly research required: The point of this undertaking is to explore, investigate, and assess the different contentions and methodologies concerning the best technique to battle hostile to social conduct with respect to neighbor debates. There are three primary techniques or ways to deal with battle (against social) neighbor questions that my exploration has found: 1. Improving rejection from specific territories (as upheld by the administration). This would incorporate laws making it simpler for social landowners to bar or kick out inhabitants from social lodging at little notification. It could likewise incorporate limitation orders whereby the blamed isn't permitted to come quite close to the property or utilize certain language in the nearness, or sound range, of their neighbors as appeared in one of the contextual analyses I have looked into (Home Office, 2003)2. It could likewise come through giving check in time orders3. 2. The second conceivable reaction is the ‘Dundee Families venture model (Hunter, 2003). This is like the 1970's technique for recovery through escalated social work and consistent sustaining of wrongdoers, just as the supporting of network partners. 3. The third methodology is one of the Webster-Stratton program as pushed by a senior teacher at the Institute of Psychiatry Stephen Scott4. This is a parent showing program, like the restoration technique above, yet includes working carefully with small kids (beneath 10 years old) and is situated in a safe domain talking kids through a video introduction, and gathering conversations on how they should diffuse dangerous circumstances when experienced upon. 4. The fourth conceivable methodology is the one pushed by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: The new arrangement for Communities (NDC) approach whereby enormous totals of cash, à ¯Ã¢ ¿Ã¢ ½800 million, is given to different neighborhoods all through the nation for the recovery of their nearby network. This could include building another park, restoring the nearby network corridor, or making an intentional association planned for tidying up spray painting. Through my primer research in the structure my clarified reference index, I have found that there are broadly differentiating sees with regards to the reasons for hostile to social conduct, and what techniques work in fighting neighbor questions and those that are much progressively combative. Every one of these systems will be inspected in my paper and I intend to investigate and assess the qualities and shortcomings of every one of these methodologies. For every methodology that I have explored I have additionally inquired about a relating contextual investigation that outlines definitely how that system functions by and by. In light of this, I intend to test every procedure by analyzing the pertinent contextual analysis against benchmark factors, for example, * How well would this technique work in the Isle of Dogs? * Who are the primary recipients, and who are the fundamental failures? * Is it commonsense? (for example financially savvy and serviceable in the present political atmosphere) * Does it focus on sex ethnic, or social, contrasts? * Does it construct relations inside the network instead of bar segments of the network? Hostile to social conduct is regularly thought to happen in districts and regions where there is a high thickness of board houses, significant levels of joblessness, and low degrees of instruction openings (Home Office (b), 2003). Anyway this suspicion can be tested, and the primary point of my exploration is to do accurately that, give a fair yet inciting contention giving the two sides of the contention to this discussion. It could be contended that just by going through cash in the recovery (for example assembling new network offices, introducing twofold coating windows, giving awards for neighborhood organizations and so forth) will individuals invest heavily in their networks and their lodging and stop the counter social conduct (Home Office (d), 2003). Anyway it could be contended that just by including those that carry out enemy of social conduct violations into society, would there be a reduction in the measure of neighbor debates [as restricted to barring them from lodging, offices, benefits etc] (Scott, 2001) and (Hunter, 2003). Then again it could be contended that just by some structure rejection can there be a settlement to hostile to social neighbor debates (Home Office (a), 2001. Information assortment: I intend to inquire about and explore: (a) Various scholastics think tanks, and the administration's perspectives on the best way to battle hostile to social conduct. (b) How these techniques are sent on the ground by assessing the contextual investigations that I have chosen. (c) Research past government subsidized enemy of social conduct activities and associations, and assess these cases against the recently referenced benchmarks, for example, * Practicalities, for example, cost, labor, and so on * How the individuals inside the network saw the undertaking * Does it focus on sex ethnic, or social, contrasts? * Does it construct relations inside the network rather than avoid segments of the network? My information assortment procedure will depend intensely upon contextual investigations that I have acquired from different scholastic diaries and government reports. Contextual analyses will be taken from the Isle of Dogs in Tower Hamlets (Nixon and Hunter, 1999), from Scotland (Scott and Parkey, 1998), from across the country considers (Nixon and Hunter. 2001), and the British Medical Journal (Scott, 2001), among others. I have refined my examination sources to be increasingly subject to contextual investigations and diary articles rather than different types of information assortment. This is on the grounds that this particular paper is searching for definite investigations of undertakings that have battled hostile to social conduct debates, instead of general data, or the perspectives on specific individuals. I have likewise contrived a survey that I will advance to a delegate test of 50 Isle of Dogs inhabitants. The poll won't structure a noteworthy piece of my examination, as I will depend vigorously working on it considers. Anyway the aftereffects of the surveys will be utilized to back up, or invalidate, the contentions that I will introduce in my exposition. The inquiries that I will advance to interviewees are as per the following: Survey. What kind of episodes would you depict as hostile to social neighbor debates? How large an issue would you rate hostile to social neighbor questions inside the Isle of Dogs on a size of 1 †10? (1 being not critical and 10 being an incredibly huge issue) Do you feel that the Isle of Dogs has an above national normal degree of hostile to social neighbor debates? What do you believe is the best strategy to forestall neighbor debates concerning grown-ups? * Punish the guardians after a few alerts * Punish the guardians right away * Give the youngsters broad social specialist consideration * Put the youngster and parent through a mentally structured preparing program on the most proficient method to carry on. * Or other, or a mix of these. In the event that so please explain†¦ Have you been engaged with an enemy of social neighbor debate inside the most recent five years? In the event that truly, at that point inquire? (b) Where you a guilty party or a ‘recipient' of the contest? I will pose these inquiries to the interviewee on a balanced premise and will organize these meetings by visiting the nearby Bengali social public venue, the neighborhood high road, the neighborhood caf㠯⠿â ½, and visiting the neighborhood benefits office (give office). Notwithstanding these sources

Deception Point Page 39

â€Å"My source isn't your anxiety. In any case, in the event that you invest some energy contemplating these figures, you will unmistakably observe that Senator Sexton doesn't have the sort of cash he is right now spending. After Katherine passed on, he wasted by far most of her inheritance on terrible ventures, individual solaces, and getting himself what gives off an impression of being sure triumph in the primaries. Starting at a half year back, your applicant was broke.† Gabrielle detected this must be a feign. On the off chance that Sexton were bankrupt, he sure wasn't acting it. He was purchasing promoting time in greater and greater hinders each week. â€Å"Your candidate,† Tench proceeded, â€Å"is at present outspending the President four to one. What's more, he has no close to home money.† â€Å"We get a great deal of donations.† â€Å"Yes, some of them legal.† Gabrielle's head shot up. â€Å"I ask your pardon?† Tench inclined over the work area, and Gabrielle could smell her nicotine breath. â€Å"Gabrielle Ashe, I will ask you an inquiry, and I propose you think cautiously before you answer. It could influence whether you spend the following barely any years in prison or not. Are you mindful that Senator Sexton is tolerating tremendous illicit crusade pay-offs from aviation organizations who have billions to pick up from the privatization of NASA?† Gabrielle gazed. â€Å"That's a crazy allegation!† â€Å"Are you saying you are uninformed of this activity?† â€Å"I figure I would know whether the congressperson were taking kickbacks of the extent you are suggesting.† Tench grinned icily. â€Å"Gabrielle, I comprehend that Senator Sexton has imparted a great deal of himself to you, yet I guarantee you there is bounty you don't think about the man.† Gabrielle held up. â€Å"This meeting is over.† â€Å"On the contrary,† Tench stated, evacuating the rest of the substance of the organizer and spreading it on the work area. â€Å"This meeting is simply beginning.† 44 Inside the habisphere's â€Å"staging room,† Rachel Sexton felt like a space traveler as she slid into one of NASA's Mark IX microclimate endurance suits. The dark, one-piece, hooded jumpsuit looked like an inflatable scuba suit. Its two-handle, adaptable foam texture was fitted with empty channels through which a thick gel was siphoned to enable the wearer to manage internal heat level in both hot and cold situations. Presently, as Rachel pulled the tight-fitting hood over her head, her eyes fell on the NASA manager. He showed up as a quiet sentinel at the entryway, plainly disappointed with the need for this little crucial. Norah Mangor was murmuring obscenities as she got everybody furnished. â€Å"Here's an extra pudgy,† she stated, hurling Corky his suit. Tolland was at that point half into his. When Rachel was completely dashed up, Norah found the stopcock on Rachel's side and associated her to a mixture tube that wound out of a silver canister taking after an enormous scuba tank. â€Å"Inhale,† Norah stated, opening the valve. Rachel heard a murmur and felt gel being infused into the suit. The adaptable foam extended, and the suit compacted around her, pushing down on her internal layer of garments. The sensation helped her to remember staying her hand submerged while wearing an elastic glove. As the hood swelled around her head, it squeezed in on her ears, making everything sound suppressed. I'm in a cover. â€Å"Best thing about the Mark IX,† Norah stated, â€Å"is the cushioning. You can fall on your butt and not feel a thing.† Rachel trusted it. She had a feeling that she was caught inside a sleeping cushion. Norah gave Rachel a progression of instruments an ice hatchet, tie snaps, and carabiners, which she appended to the belt tackled on Rachel's midriff. â€Å"All this?† Rachel asked, peering toward the rigging. â€Å"To go 200 yards?† Norah's eyes limited. â€Å"You need to come or not?† Tolland gave Rachel a consoling gesture. â€Å"Norah's simply being careful.† Corky associated with the implantation tank and swelled his suit, looking diverted. â€Å"I feel like I'm wearing a mammoth condom.† Norah gave an appalled moan. â€Å"Like you'd know, virgin boy.† Tolland plunked down close to Rachel. He gave her a frail grin as she wore her substantial boots and crampons. â€Å"You sure you need to come?† His eyes had a defensive worry that attracted her. Rachel trusted her sure gesture gave a false representation of her developing anxiety. 200 yards†¦ not far by any stretch of the imagination. â€Å"And you figured you could discover energy just on the high seas.† Tolland laughed, talking as he connected his own crampons. â€Å"I've chosen I like fluid water far superior to this solidified stuff.† â€Å"I've never been a major aficionado of either,† Rachel said. â€Å"I fell through the ice as a child. Water's made me anxious ever since.† Tolland looked over, his eyes thoughtful. â€Å"Sorry to hear that. At the point when this is finished, you'll need to come out and visit me on the Goya. I'll alter your perspective on water. Promise.† The greeting shocked her. The Goya was Tolland's exploration transport notable both from its job in Amazing Seas just as its notoriety for being one of the most abnormal looking boats on the sea. Albeit a visit to the Goya would be terrifying for Rachel, she realized it is difficult to leave behind. â€Å"She's tied down twelve miles off the bank of New Jersey at the moment,† Tolland stated, battling with his crampon locks. â€Å"Sounds like an improbable spot.† â€Å"Not by any stretch of the imagination. The Atlantic seaboard is an unbelievable spot. We were equipping to shoot another narrative when I was so inconsiderately hindered by the President.† Rachel giggled. â€Å"Shooting a narrative on what?† â€Å"Sphyrna mokarran and megaplumes.† Rachel scowled. â€Å"Glad I asked.† Tolland wrapped up his crampons and turned upward. â€Å"Seriously, I'll be shooting out there for a long time. Washington's not that a long way from the Jersey coast. Come out when you get back home. No motivation to go through your time on earth terrified of the water. My team would give a first class reception for you.† Norah Mangor's voice blastd. â€Å"Are we heading outside, or should I get both of you a few candles and champagne?† 45 Gabrielle Ashe had no clue what to think about the archives presently spread out before her on Marjorie Tench's work area. The heap included copied letters, faxes, transcripts of telephone discussions, and they all appeared to help the claim that Senator Sexton was in secret exchange with private space organizations. Tench pushed several grainy high contrast photos toward Gabrielle. â€Å"I expect this is brand new information to you?† Gabrielle took a gander at the photographs. The principal genuine shot indicated Senator Sexton escaping a taxi in an underground carport. Sexton never takes taxis. Gabrielle took a gander at the second shot-a fax of Sexton moving into a stopped white minivan. An elderly person had all the earmarks of being in the van sitting tight for him. â€Å"Who is that?† Gabrielle stated, dubious the photographs may be faked. â€Å"A top dog from the SFF.† Gabrielle was suspicious. â€Å"The Space Frontier Foundation?† The SFF resembled a â€Å"union† for private space organizations. It spoke to aviation temporary workers, business visionaries, financial speculators any private substance that needed to go into space. They would in general be condemning of NASA, contending that the U.S. space program utilized unreasonable strategic approaches to keep privately owned businesses from propelling missions into space. â€Å"The SFF,† Tench stated, â€Å"now speaks to over a hundred significant companies, some exceptionally well off endeavors who are standing by energetically for the Space Commercialization Promotions Act to be ratified.† Gabrielle thought about it. For evident reasons the SFF was a vocal supporter of Sexton's battle, in spite of the fact that the representative had been mindful so as not to get excessively near them in light of their disputable campaigning strategies. As of late the SFF had distributed a dangerous tirade charging that NASA was in certainty a â€Å"illegal monopoly† whose capacity to work at a misfortune and still remain in business spoke to unreasonable rivalry to private firms. As indicated by the SFF, at whatever point AT T required a telecomm satellite propelled, a few private space organizations extended to do the employment opportunity at a sensible $50 million. Lamentably, NASA consistently stepped in and offered to dispatch AT T's satellites for a unimportant twenty-5,000,000, despite the fact that it cost NASA multiple times that to carry out the responsibility! Working at a misfortune is one way NASA keeps its hold on space, the SFF legal counselors blamed. What's mor e, citizens take care of the check.

21L.011

21L.011 As a freshman you will probably be taking two sciences, a math, and a humanities class. The sciences and maths are pretty standard fare; youll have a couple classes to choose from based on the results of your placement tests, APs, and whether youd prefer Chem or Bio first semester. On the other hand, youre given an enormous amount of variety to select your humanities, arts, and social sciences (HASS) class from. Whereas the science and math classes are arranged after you arrive to MIT, rising freshmen enter a lottery during the summer for their HASS course preferences. There are some really exciting classes that are available for freshmen to take. I had a hard time selecting my top preferences; I was torn between 24.02, Moral Problems and the Good Life, and 21H.001, How to Stage a Revolution. On the one hand, Moral Problems sounded like a really awesome debate class, touching on subjects like objective goods, rational desire, and pleasure. On the other hand, How to Stage a Revolution* has the coolest course name in all of academia.** Its a history class where students analyze “fundamental questions about the causes and nature of revolutions.” *An aside: My classmates in senior year voted me most likely to lead a revolution. **Aside II: It was even submitted to reddit.com, and no, not by me, not even by an MIT person. In the end the lottery granted me 24.02, but this conflicted with my chemistry lecture. As I mentioned before my advisor was really good about, well, advising me on what to do. I “shopped” around by attending some HASS lectures of classes that fit my schedule. I looked into three courses, but the only one that really stood out to me was 21L.011, The Film Experience. I emailed the professor about signing a form that would officially enter me into the class, and he replied that it wouldnt be a problem. A couple days later and my online schedule reflected the changeâ€"conflict successfully resolved! The class is amazing. On Tuesdays there are two lectures about the history of film and particular directors styles. Professor Thorburn usually throws in some short film clips in his lectures to illustrate the points as hes making them. On Tuesday evenings after the last lecture the teaching staff screens the weeks movie. Were not required to stay for the movies since they usually run past 10:30pm, and the staff also makes sure that every movie is available in the Film Office. On Thursdays we have recitation sections in much smaller groups of students. My section has something like 15 people in it, which provides for a great environment to have an open discussion about aspects of the films of the week. My recitation leader is also a published writer of fiction, so its not like a bunch of college students talking about random things. The recitations are free-form but directed. About every month we have a paper due on one of about 30 topics (or you can make your own). The fantastic thing about the papers, though, is that theres effectively a week-long grace period for turning them in. If you hand in your paper before the grace period starts, you will get your paper back with comments and a preliminary grade before the grace period is over. You can choose to revise your paper with these comments in mind, as long as your turn it in before the week is over. Your preliminary grade disappears and is replaced with the grade of the revision. This really helped me on the first essay, since I had a big decision to make about the direction of my paper. I talked to my recitation leader and she was very helpful with my revision. Unfortunately, this revision policy isnt uniform across HASS classes, and it would be pretty difficult to identify the courses that offer it (its not in the syllabi or course descriptions). Overall, though, the best thing about the class has to be the movies. I mean, we get to watch great films by legendary directors like Chaplin, Keaton, Capra, and Hitchcock for credit. And the way Prof. Thorburn puts each movie in context truly makes it an experience, more than just entertainment. We get the stories behind the films, the “inside scoop” on the way they utilized new film technology or the camera techniques and plot devices the legends used to turn Hollywood on its head. And in the end, if you can really savor a film (or a book for that matter), writing a paper about it isnt as much a chore as it is a reconfirmation of your bond with the work. That sounds sappy, but its true. Its so easy for me to write about Buster Keaton where I had trouble in high school writing about, say, The English Patient. All in all, 21L.011 is turning out to be an awesome experience, and I look forward to the movies well watch throughout the remainder of the semester.